Nope - what i quoted was an extract from the SSC. There would appear to be some sort of lease in place between SSC and CML - it didnt say it was for the hut.
Standard Ts and Cs for lease contracts usually contain a clause that allows the landlord to 'inspect' the property - but the details of exactly how that happens is dependant on the conditions of the lease.
With regards to removing property - i dont think the webcams etc were the property of the tenants - SSC. I dont know what the SSC agreed with CML with regards to access and whether the equipment was retained by CML or given back to SSC and/or Winterhighland. Alan would be the person to shed any light on this.
I also dont know what the agreement was between SSC and Winterhighland with regards to the webcams either. All this has a bearing on the actions of CML.
As a solicitor once told me - the only person who can decide on the legality of something is a judge in a court of law.
Not been reading the thread from the start eh???
Anyway Alan has replied.
SSC own the hut, & lease the land from the land owners (who are NOT NR)
For 100% clarity for certain people, .....Alan/Doug can you state who bought & owns the cameras & weather station that have been damaged/interfered with.
Also when they were installed so we have an idea as to "how long they have been used freely, without objection , hindrance, etc"
---That was not a fall, I intended to do that!---